FDA proposal may change definition of "healthy"

FDA proposal may change definition of “healthy”

Breakfast may be known as “the most important meal of the day,” but from piles of bacon to boxes of donuts, it’s often not necessarily the healthiest. Many brands of cereals not better It’s probably safe to say that no one has ever made marshmallows out of their Lucky Charms and congratulated themselves on a well-balanced meal. But the Food and Drug Administration is currently looking to change its official definition of the term “healthy,” and if they do, a number of common pills will no longer be cut.

Late last month, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a proposed change in the qualifications that foods must meet to classify themselves as “healthy” — a term the agency first defined in 1994. FDA explained The proposed new rules are intended to “provide a better explanation of how all nutrients in different food groups contribute and may work synergistically to create healthy dietary patterns and improve health” in contrast to the current definition which is based only on individual nutrients.

The Food and Drug Administration wrote: “Under the proposed definition, more foods that are part of a healthy eating pattern and recommended by the Dietary Guidelines would be eligible to use the claim on their labels, including nuts and seeds, high-fat fish (such as salmon) and certain oils.” and water.”

However, as the Food and Drug Administration acknowledges, the changes may also force some foods to drop their health claims — and one example the agency has fired several times is breakfast cereals, in large part due to the increasing focus of the proposed definition on added sugars.

“The current definition allows manufacturers to use the ‘healthy’ claim in certain foods that, based on the latest nutritional science and Federal Dietetic Guidelines, contain levels of nutrients that will not assist consumers in maintaining healthy dietary practices (for example, some ready-to-eat cereals that May have a high content of added sugars),” The proposed rule states. “Consequently, we believe that the definition of a ‘healthy’ claim needs to be updated in order to ensure that products bearing this claim are products that may help consumers maintain healthy eating practices.”

The grain was also mentioned in the Food and Drug Administration’s announcement of the proposed rule change as an example of a food that should “adhere to certain limits for certain nutrients, such as saturated fats, sodium, and added sugars.” “Grains should contain ounces of whole grains and contain no more than 1 gram of saturated fat, 230 mg of sodium and 2.5 grams of added sugars,” the agency said.

as such CNBC pointed out Yesterday, a lot of well-known grains didn’t fit these criteria: the grid specifically named raisin bran (9g added sugars), honey nut (12g added sugars), cornflakes (300mg sodium; 4g added sugars). ), bunches of Oats with Honey (8 g of added sugars), Small Wheat Frozen (12 g of added sugars), Life (8 g of added sugars), and K (270 mg of sodium, 4 g of added sugars) Also be able to bear the label “healthy”.

The Secretary of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, explained that getting people to understand that our knowledge of what is “healthy” has changed since 1994 is kind of a point. He stated that “a lot of people may not know what healthy food is.” “The FDA’s move will help educate more Americans to improve health outcomes, address health disparities, and save lives.”

But don’t be surprised if some “healthy” food producers now decide to object to the proposed rule change. It is currently open for comment through December 28.

#FDA #proposal #change #definition #healthy

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *